A Very Special Discussion about DC's Relaunch: Barbara Gordon, Batgirl Again
A Very Special Discussion about DC’s Relaunch:
Barbara Gordon, Batgirl Again
Yesterday, DC announced that one of the relaunched titles in the DC Universe come September is Batgirl, written by C!TB favourite Gail Simone with art by Ardian Syaf and Vicente Cifuentes. This is the stickiest matter of these newly announced titles for me. I adore Gail Simone. I adore Barbara Gordon, both as Batgirl and as Oracle, and I have ever since I was a little boy. One of the biggest questions I had in my head when DC announced this whole thing was: What will happen to Barbara? Will she still be in her wheelchair? Yesterday, we got our answer: Barbara will be Batgirl once again. Simone has spoken already about her delight in continuing to write her favourite character in comics, and I’m definitely excited I’ll still get to read her take on one of my favourite characters for a while longer.
But at the same time, I cannot in good conscience ignore the genuine hurt and frustration experienced by people like Jill Pantozzi, who wrote about the importance of having somebody in comics in a wheelchair for someone in a wheelchair herself. I definitely wish that there could be a way that Jill and people like her could not be hurt, because I understand how that kind of hurt feels.
I’m Metis, one of Canada’s recognized aboriginal peoples, and the reality is that there aren’t very many roles for my people in popular culture. In DC’s universe, the only aboriginal characters I can think of are Man of Bats and Robin Red, little-seen members of the Batmen of All Nations and, presently, Batman Incorporated, as long as it lasts. On Marvel’s side of things, there’s Danielle Moonstar and Warpath, both of whom are deeply connected to the traditional culture of what’s more or less analogous to Canada’s First Nations. The thing is, though, I’m not First Nations. My family isn’t connected to life on a reservation. We’re something else, and that something else isn’t really a part of even the small part of mainstream comics that aboriginal people fit into. In my personal life, I’ve had classmates announce that all “Natives” would spend any money they got on was alcohol and cigarettes and not be corrected or reprimanded by anybody, not even the teacher. A significant portion of my country believes and will openly state that they dislike and resent aboriginal people, and sometimes even to my face because they don’t realize my heritage.
Like I said, I understand that kind of hurt not seeing someone like you in culture can bring about, even if my own difficulties are hardly on the day-to-day impact of persons in wheelchairs. I agree that comics desperately need more diversity and I can understand how removing Barbara Gordon from such a source of her strength and the inspiration she provides to others [Ed note: Seriously, read Jill’s piece, it’s brilliant] can create such an emotional response in people.
The thing is, I’m not sure there’s a great option here, at least on the topic of causing hurt and offense. The Killing Joke is, more than 20 years later, still a remarkably polarizing work due to the decision to have the Joker paralyze Barbara. To some readers, the fact that Barbara, almost alone (excepting the Calculator’s daughter Wendy/Proxy) in modern comics, remains disabled after a significant injury and in the face of a world where magic and science can create marvels much more complicated than repairing a spinal cord, is offensive, an example of “Women in Refrigerators” and the generally disproportionate treatment of the genders in mainstream comics.
I can imagine that some people are as happy to see Barbara walking again as they were offended when she wasn’t. They could be happy right now, but that doesn’t mean that differently abled persons like Jill don’t rightfully feel hurt by the decision; I will not tell anybody how to feel.
So where does that leave DC? No matter what they do with the character, people will be offended. Rightfully offended. This die was cast when they published The Killing Joke and again when they first had Barbara become Oracle. They’ve made their bed, and they will lay in it. At this point, all they can do is move forward; I sincerely doubt Simone or DC will cripple Barbara once again, and even if she did, that would be an awful decision because it would be grotesquely offensive to repeat a violent crippling out of some bizarre idea of fan service. Barbara is going to be Batgirl and that is more or less that.
Luckily, there’s still an ace in the proverbial hole: Gail Simone herself. Gail is easily one of the, if not the, writers in the mainstream comics industry most dedicated to representing diversity and respect for all people, whatever their identity or condition. She’s also one of the finest writers in the industry, period. If anybody can make this relaunched Batgirl work, it is her, and I am heartened by this response to the issue she tweeted:
That’s the best it can be, I think. Simone will make the best comic she can, which is pretty fucking great, and I trust she will tackle the issue and the character that she loves respectfully. I look forward to reading it, I’m still excited to read it, but my exuberance is tempered by the reminder that this is not a simple case of “make good comics.” This is a matter of deep, personal importance for people, a matter of respect, and I have to keep that in mind. I hope that the industry can grow to a place where diversity can be better represented, even if Barbara Gordon is no longer in a wheelchair. I hope that Batgirl is a great comic and that it doesn’t cause any more hurt than it already has. People deserve that much. It’s only right.



I was with you up until ‘rightfully offended’. Why is it right for someone to be offended at her being in a wheelchair, just because she happens to be a woman?
Does it somehow take away from Cyborg’s blackness that he’s disabled? (Or are artificial limbs somehow less offensive than a wheelchair?)
No, not in any way. Nor does it take away that Oracle’s ability to kick butt because she’s in a wheelchair, she just does it in a different way.
That is where the problem lies with this. Other disabled characters in comics like Cyborg and Daredevil have abilities that can overcome their disability, but Barbara Gordon lived with hers and kicked butt in a unique way. That’s what being in a wheelchair is like. We have to live with our limitations, but we all can still find our own ways of doing things and we can still kick butt in our own ways.
Now, with Barbara going back to being Batgirl, there’s no one left in DC Comics to show people this side of it. (I don’t really follow Marvel enough to know what Professor X is up to lately to know the Marvel side of things.)
The issue of people being offended with Babs’ paraplegia is more a part of the overall discussion of gender parity in comics, I think. For a lot of people, seeing characters like Bucky, Speedy/Arsenal, Cyborg and the like receiving prosthetics/treatments to lessen/overcome their disability, or multiple characters (usually male) returning from the dead, while Barbara remained paralyzed, was part of a gender inequity in comics that’s frequently hard to deny. I’m not saying I agree with it - I liked Babs as Oracle very much because of the reasons you give - but I definitely understand people’s frustration with the seeming illogic of Barbara remaining paralyzed. Ultimately, she became a stronger character as Oracle, and a big part of me is sad to see that voice of overcoming limitations disappear from DC, but I was mostly trying to acknowledge that it’s a sticky issue filled with more than one viewpoint. I’ve come across a lot of people who get very emotional about that part of The Killing Joke, and I wanted to acknowledge their opinions and feelings without discounting them.
I hope that DC retains or develops someone in the DCU to be a voice like Babs was as Oracle. They might retain Wendy Harris, Proxy, as one; I’ve liked her arc in Bryan Q. Miller’s Batgirl, but it was intertwined with Babs and so I’m not sure how it would work without Oracle. Still, I hope they can find at least one person (preferably more) to represent what Oracle represented. The DCU would be a less welcoming place without it.
Yeah, if they can find/create a character to fill her role, someone who isn’t just a token but a cool character in their own right, (and still involved in what’s going on, not a character that only shows up once a year like Xavier was last time I read X-related comics), I won’t mind so much.
The problem is that at this point, any effort DC makes in that regard will seem like blatant tokenism and pandering. At this moment, DC is screwed no matter what they do, but they’re less screwed if they stay the course. Adding a new disabled character? That character will always be remembered as the compromise DC made to try to calm people down after Oracle. Changing the decision to make Barbara Gordon Batgirl or crippling her again? That would go over SWIMMINGLY. If by swimming, you mean bathing yourself in meat-infused meat sauce and jumping in a river filled with piranhas before toweling off. And in this case, I do.
It’s bad. It sucks. It was not a good move, and it doesn’t seem to have been carefully considered - it certainly doesn’t seem like they considered all the potential impacts and planned for them. Meh. Frustrating.
Fancy running into you here, B.J.
Gonna be up for Thursday night?
Hey Puckett, yep, I think so. Depends if my shoulder recovers in time from my L.A. Noire-a-thon I have planned for tonight (just got the game, have to try it out), but I figure it probably will.
L.A. Noire should be fairly easy on your shoulder, actually. Let your partner drive and don’t be afraid to use Action Skip if you need to. After that, it’s just walking around and finding clues.
I was thinking she’ll probably become Oracle again. Knowing Gail’s love for the character, and her vocal disapproval of the Killing Joke story, I think it makes sense that the point of the reboot might be to revisit her time as Batgirl and trace a more direct and personal line from one to the next, rather than upholding her origin as fodder from a Batman story not involving her, since it was not the intention to make her Oracle in the first place. That seems to be the point of reboots anyway, so get a clearer handle on how to execute a story once you know the endgame.
The DC relaunch is the first chance in years for me to get interested in that company’s characters. I’d love to watch that story unfold, if that’s what does end up happening. To keep her as Oracle from the start seems like a waste of potential to watch the character discover herself again.
But then again, this isn’t meant to justify the decision or even to state a preference as to whether she walks or not. It will require time to wait and see, so down the road, I may be proven wrong. I’m just giving Gail Simone the benefit of the doubt.
[...] See the controversy here and here. [...]
hey mr J.L.,
I don’t read any batbooks and dont know anything about batgirl(s) but i enjoyed this article - especially your discussion/comparison of your metis heritage.
keep on rockin and dont stop rockin and so on
I wrote an article on this issue for Bleeding Cool: http://bit.ly/n1BqL2 If you’re in agreement with the article, then come check out the Barbara’s Not Broken cause page on Facebook.